Identifying Opinion Holders for Question Answering in Opinion Texts

نویسندگان

  • Soo-Min Kim
  • Eduard Hovy
چکیده

Question answering in opinion texts has so far mostly concentrated on the identification of opinions and on analyzing the sentiment expressed in opinions. In this paper, we address another important part of Question Answering (QA) in opinion texts: finding opinion holders. Holder identification is a central part of full opinion identification and can be used independently to answer several opinion questions such as “Is China supporting Bush’s war on Iraq?” and “Do Iraqi people want U.S. troops in their soil?”. Our system automatically learns the syntactic features signaling opinion holders using a Maximum Entropy ranking algorithm trained on human annotated data. Using syntactic parsing features, our system achieved 64% accuracy on identifying the holder of opinions in the MPQA dataset.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Identifying Opinion Holders and Targets with Dependency Parser in Chinese News Texts

In this paper, we propose to identify opinion holders and targets with dependency parser in Chinese news texts, i.e. to identify opinion holders by means of reporting verbs and to identify opinion targets by considering both opinion holders and opinion-bearing words. The experiments with NTCIR-7 MOAT’s Chinese test data show that our approach provides better performance than the baselines and m...

متن کامل

Construction of an Evaluation Corpus for Opinion Extraction

Opinion retrieval aims to tell if a document is positive, neutral or negative on a given topic. Opinion extraction further identifies the document’s supportive and the non-supportive evidence. This paper defines the annotation of opinionated material. The algorithm employs opinion holders, a topic’s conceptual words, sentiment words, opinion operators, and negation operators to recognize opinio...

متن کامل

A Comparative Study of Open Domain and Opinion Question Answering Systems for Factual and Opinionated Queries

The development of the Web 2.0 led to the birth of new textual genres such as blogs, reviews or forum entries. The increasing number of such texts and the highly diverse topics they discuss make blogs a rich source for analysis. This paper presents a comparative study on open domain and opinion QA systems. A collection of opinion and mixed fact-opinion questions in English is defined and two Qu...

متن کامل

Identifying Topical Opinion Leaders in Social Community Question Answering

Social community question answering (SCQA) sites not only provide regular question answering (QA) service but also form a social network where users can follow each other. Identifying topical opinion leaders who are both expert and influential in SCQA becomes a hot research topic. However, existing works focus on either using knowledge expertise to find experts for improving the quality of answ...

متن کامل

Towards Answering Opinion Questions: Separating Facts from Opinions and Identifying the Polarity of Opinion Sentences

Opinion question answering is a challenging task for natural language processing. In this paper, we discuss a necessary component for an opinion question answering system: separating opinions from fact, at both the document and sentence level. We present a Bayesian classifier for discriminating between documents with a preponderance of opinions such as editorials from regular news stories, and ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005